Mapping research trends and identifying gaps in suicide literature during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63719/imrj.2026.12.01.002Abstract
Suicide is a major global public health concern, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial impact on mental health worldwide. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global trends and identifies gaps in the literature on suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2023 using data retrieved from the Scopus database. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using Python, BiblioMagika, Biblioshiny, and VOSviewer, and a total of 2232 relevant articles were identified. The findings show a concentration of research output in high-income countries, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, highlighting substantial geographical disparities. In contrast, low- and middle-income countries with high suicide rates, particularly those in Africa and Southeast Asia, remain underrepresented. The University of Melbourne, the University of Toronto, and the University of California emerged as major hubs for mental health research, with extensive international collaboration networks. High-impact journals, especially the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, and the Journal of Affective Disorders, dominated the publication landscape. The analysis also highlights the limited prominence of longitudinal research and themes related to protective factors and resilience. Addressing these gaps may help strengthen the evidence base for suicide research and prevention during future global crises.
References
Worldometers. COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Worldometers. 2024 (2024 Feb 20). Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
United Nations. Policy brief: COVID-19 and the need for action on mental health. United Nations Sustainable Development Group. 2020 (2024 Oct 30). Available from: https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-covid-19-and-need-action-mental-health.
Tanaka T, Okamoto S. Increase in suicide following an initial decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(2):229–38. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01042-z.
Kim UR, Sung H. Urban parks as a potential mitigator of suicide rates resulting from global pandemics: empirical evidence from past experiences in Seoul, Korea. Cities. 2022;127:103725. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103725.
Al-Mamun F, Kaggwa MM, Hosen I, Sikder MdT, Griffiths MD, Mamun MA. Suicide related to the COVID-19 pandemic in India: a systematic review. Discov Psychol. 2023;3(1):2. doi:10.1007/s44202-022-00063-1.
Cheung YT, Chau PH, Yip PSF. A revisit on older adults suicides and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in Hong Kong. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23(12):1231–8. doi:10.1002/gps.2056.
Jung SJ, Lim SS, Yoon JH. Fluctuations in influenza-like illness epidemics and suicide mortality: a time-series regression of 13-year mortality data in South Korea. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0244596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244596.
Gunnell D, Appleby L, Arensman E, Hawton K, John A, Kapur N, et al. Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(6):468–71. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30171-1.
Baraibar-Diez E, Luna M, Odriozola MD, Llorente I. Mapping social impact: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12(22):9389. doi:10.3390/su12229389.
Devos P, Ménard J. Trends in worldwide research in hypertension over the period 1999-2018: a bibliometric study. Hypertension. 2020;76(5):1649–55. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15711.
Belter CW. Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103(4):219–21.doi:10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.014.
Abd-Alrazaq A, Schneider J, Mifsud B, Alam T, Househ M, Hamdi M, et al. A comprehensive overview of the COVID-19 literature: machine learning-based bibliometric analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e23703. doi:10.2196/23703.
De Leo D, Goodfellow B, Silverman M, Berman A, Mann J, Arensman E, et al. Original research: international study of definitions of English-language terms for suicidal behaviours: a survey exploring preferred terminology. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e043409. doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-043409.
Large M, Corderoy A, McHugh C. Is suicidal behaviour a stronger predictor of later suicide than suicidal ideation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021;55(3):254–67. doi:10.1177/0004867420931161.
Hill NTM, Robinson J, Pirkis J, Andriessen K, Krysinska K, Payne A, et al. Association of suicidal behavior with exposure to suicide and suicide attempt: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(3):e1003074. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003074.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–96. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Ahmi A. biblioMagika®: a bibliometric analysis tool. biblioMagika. 2024 (2024 Aug 30). Available from: https://bibliomagika.com/.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics.2010;84(2):523–38. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959–75. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Lim RG, Voon SP, Yahya F, Mohamad FS, Ahmi A. Global and LMIC insights into acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): a bibliometric study from 1998 to 2023. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2024;33:100796. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100796.
Ahmi A. OpenRefine: an approachable tool for cleaning and harmonizing bibliographical data. AIP Conf Proc. 2023;2827(1):030006. doi:10.1063/5.0164724.
Mondal H, Mondal S, Mondal S. How to choose title and keywords for manuscript according to medical subject headings. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;5(3):141–4. doi:10.4103/IJVES.IJVES_15_18.
Song Y, Chen X, Hao T, Liu Z, Lan Z. Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Comput Educ. 2019;137:12–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002.
Grover S, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GM. COVID-19 and suicidal behavior: a bibliometric assessment. Asian J Psychiatry. 2021;65:102817. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102817.
Petersen OH. Inequality of research funding between different countries and regions is a serious problem for global science. Function. 2021;2(6):zqab060. doi:10.1093/function/zqab060.
OECD/European Union. Health at a glance: Europe 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. doi:10.1787/85e4b6a1-en.
World Health Organization. Suicide mortality rate. World Health Organization. 2024 (2024 Feb 20). Available from: https://data.who.int/indicators/i/16BBF41.
Wade M, Prime H, Browne DT. Why we need longitudinal mental health research with children and youth during (and after) the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113143. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113143.
Heinsch M, Wells H, Sampson D, Wootten A, Cupples M, Sutton C, et al. Protective factors for mental and psychological wellbeing in Australian adults: a review. Ment Health Prev. 2022;25:200192. doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2020.200192.
Sher L. Resilience as a focus of suicide research and prevention. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019;140(2):169–80. doi:10.1111/acps.13059.
Mesman E, Vreeker A, Hillegers M. Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents: an update of the recent literature and future directions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021;34(6):586–92. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000741.
Elsevier. Scopus content coverage guide. Elsevier; 2020.
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
